On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: > > Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead > > of reading IUSE, as suggested by Ciaran McCreesh. As a result of > > this change, vala.eclass now defaults to assuming that vala support > > is optional (which is the case in an overwhelming majority of > > ebuilds that would want to use this eclass). > > Sorry but, why even in_iuse function from eutils.eclass cannot be > used? If that is really not allowed, why we have that function in > eutils.eclass?
We had this discussion when the function was introduced. It's supposed to be used for cosmetic things only. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
