-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 20/09/12 02:24 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:23:51 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> <a...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I'm biased, so to me just auditing what portage does would be
>> good enough. :D
>
> You also need to audit what Portage did since EAPI 0 was
> introduced.
>
No, I don't think so. What portage does *now* is the important thing
for EAPI={0,1,2,3,4,5}, not what it has done over the course of history.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlBbbQMACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDeFQD8C1//65PwCKUAM6FVHci7AcoU
vuzYaUdCMHD1kEKYea0BAIkJYfkKWsmQCWreNjN+qpwflA1Hrpou/rOFfNpcBGHl
=BJPR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
