On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 13:04 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I'll also remove as-is from @GPL-COMPATIBLE and @OSI-APPROVED again, > as soon as all packages in the system set have been fixed (only > net-misc/openssh and sys-apps/man-pages). It shouldn't have been added > to these groups, in the first place.
I have been using "as-is" to mean licenses that allow anything and everything as long as the copyright notice is preserved. For example, # This file is free software; the author(s) gives unlimited # permission to copy and/or distribute it, with or without # modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. If "as-is" will be removed from @GPL_COMPATIBLE, what gpl-compatible license should I use instead for such packages?
