>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> I have one question: The license can be GPL-compatible but the > software itself non-free. So binary-only packages distributed under > e.g. BSD license should remain BSD or not? Yes, if it's BSD licensed then it should have LICENSE="BSD". > If we start to measure the software freedom of the code inside the > package, then maybe LICENSE is the wrong variable to express this. I'm aware that we can't distinguish the two cases. Should we have a "binary-only" license to catch it? Ulrich
