On 01/10/2012 13:54, Rich Freeman wrote: > I don't think we can keep the discussion off -dev forever though. It > seems like we're close to being able to implement, which means lots of > changes that impact all devs. I can't imagine that we'd want to > implement that without some kind of council vote. Perhaps the > appropriate approach is to propose a GLEP?
No, the appropriate approach is first to _talk with Infra_. Guys I said that before, but unless you actually factor in Infra when you want infrastructure stuff done, you have to do the work yourself. And it might not be nice and fun. Honestly, this whole thread, with the exception of Rafael, makes me facepalm incredibly, because everybody is saying "it's easy!" without asking the people who have done the work up to now and will have to manage it. And it pisses me off. (Among other things, because it feels like most of the complains about the way tinderbox's logs are handled, "it's easy!" but nobody but me is ever going to pick up the task, ...) So to close this in a few words: You walk the walk, you talk the talk. And I have no intention to read another mail with "what other awesome thing we can do if we migrate to git and we don't even have to worry about what it might happen on the serverside because git is just magical and will sort itself out", okay? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
