On 11/18/2012 12:05 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 17/11/2012 21:00, Richard Yao wrote: >> I am afraid that I have to disappoint you. If we were using the >> waterfall model, I could outline some very nice long term goals for you, >> but we are doing AGILE development, so long term goals have not been >> well defined. > > Can I step in and just as you to shut your mouth? It might not be the > most tactful way to say it, but the more you write, the more Gentoo as a > whole project is looking like a circus... the "AGILE" bullshit was > really the last straw for me trying to keep quiet... >
I would appreciate it if people would avoid harassing others that decide to develop things different than what they want to use. Read GLEP 0039: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html We do not need to justify the need for our project before it is announced or even after it is announced. It is free to conflict with RedHat's systemd project. If we find next year that we can reconcile with Kay Sievers and Lennart Poettering, then we are free to do that. These projects need not be long term commitments. There is absolutely no reason for this harassment.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
