-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió: >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina >> <zeroch...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> I'm confident no one would >>> attempt to block my adding eselect-bzip2 to the tree (aside from my poor >>> coding skills), >> >> ++ >> >>> but would anyone be interested in blocking using lbzip2 >>> by default? It seems pretty safe and I've done dozens of full system >>> builds etc. >> >> Why not just make it an option to start, advertise it by all means, >> and then see how it turns out with volunteers before we make it the >> default. Going from nobody-has-heard-of-it to default overnight seems >> a bit much. >> >> Rich >> >> > > How this ended finally? :/ It ended with my setting PORTAGE_BZIP2_COMMAND="lbzip2" in my profile and moving on with my life. I am very not good at eselect scripts and I've not had the time to dig at it. You are welcome to work on the eselect script if you like.
> Thanks for the info! > - -Zero -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ5N63AAoJEKXdFCfdEflKdn0P/R9W6idHgpd+n7y5nyKQM9si noHmFC6KHJSZJnjO8BlrhsN2HZrgZyPqPIlWLn5VwK+KcDTh0s1y4UGGh22a93qD JodVbmmSJlnWA+EkzNloG+nTk1FxJYnmoL7o6/dhqv5x1Q/FD/xf0rAGCgTvDPSb RuoMbCfkgSwZZlSSJtHr7Xd3w1psAgVemXNcG1C49AmnNrrmEkvawk5SNzg5Ruyn UVMKSbLt1zEkRmUZHWS+lizN+GjFMVlaPEb6KK7ELbYWEMIjBihZ0WqdSWQ5Yxcn yaZN9RTM2xel9tS+PEZjxwCBwb4ndXxuj51zK91WeTeWL+1wvwRXQ0nL+jFi3WfA 9nIHe26Cop5btYnCw2/5wlmKYReAxasql0ZVS8mrob5IgiptMIrxCAhCq8raJVZn VD3+GiWzHYQRBUEkwQq/Qq7n7d5hgyd8l2/CCSgNUxmNbtFLoNWxPK5aVvEeb5EH zyLH0eOQp4JA2ViZtnYgkviFRaEr9pa+Kc2S4BbvPTqYOX7Q7Ah2LMOw8uXQMefB cNlVBa6ar5feAybWkmKH+c9n6mjAU9iCWyuoATSUMpSQ1dPmDnmKmxst4kARgMVK Ou1F4mREQk7N23AqAnREF3b4RNLQqv6ff5GuxG4COjXZpIynFcm4o/x4nnzan6xr ALCXZ5LIRk5D5K//oYJU =yYs4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----