-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
>> <zeroch...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> I'm confident no one would
>>> attempt to block my adding eselect-bzip2 to the tree (aside from my poor
>>> coding skills),
>>
>> ++
>>
>>> but would anyone be interested in blocking using lbzip2
>>> by default?  It seems pretty safe and I've done dozens of full system
>>> builds etc.
>>
>> Why not just make it an option to start, advertise it by all means,
>> and then see how it turns out with volunteers before we make it the
>> default.  Going from nobody-has-heard-of-it to default overnight seems
>> a bit much.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
> 
> How this ended finally? :/
It ended with my setting PORTAGE_BZIP2_COMMAND="lbzip2" in my profile
and moving on with my life.  I am very not good at eselect scripts and
I've not had the time to dig at it. You are welcome to work on the
eselect script if you like.

> Thanks for the info!
> 

- -Zero
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=yYs4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to