On 01/04/2013 05:31 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 01/03/2013 02:58 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 02/01/13 15:29, Luca Barbato wrote: >>>> last I checked prefix didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap >>>> either. there is no circular deps either. >>> >>> check glib deps iirc some non-glibc platforms have few problems with it. >> >> not if you enable USE=internal-glib. i've added the USE flag on request >> from vapier mostly, so we could punt pkg-config-lite from Portage. it >> should not depend on any of the stuff embedded (uclibc) has problems >> with anymore. as for anything other than uclibc, glibc, i'd like to see >> an bug, there isn't one >> >> > > Doesn't that violate our policy on bundled libraries? > > I would like to see us switch after Diego is happy with tinderbox > testing. That would put us in a position to eliminate glib from many > non-GNOME systems, provided that we kill the glib dependency in > udev/eudev. That is something worth exploring. >
Scratch that. The glib dependency in udev/eudev is purely optional. The only dependency is in pkg-config.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
