On 01/13/2013 07:03 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 01/13/2013 09:43 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 01/13/2013 03:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Hello, >> >>> Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results >>> in: >> >>> HOMEPAGE.missing 1 >>> app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild >> >>> Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies for 'dev' >>> profiles >> >>> Please fix these important QA issues first. >> >>> Why is this considered an 'important QA issue'? Does the policy >>> really say that if something doesn't have a homepage, we're >>> supposed to put garbage in there? >> >> >> >> That is already lifted: >> https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-660007.2 >> >> seems to be a repoman bug or just not yet implemented > > repoman is intended to enforce policies, which can be stricter than pms. > So, the question is, what is our policy going to be?
+1 to allow empty/missing HOMEPAGE variable dead homepage => useless http://gentoo.org => useless https://bugs.gentoo.org => too obvious
