On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:27:06 -0300 Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:46:06 +0100 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > Alexis, > > > > Following your remark, I have redesigned the loop to use MULTILIB_ABIS > > list to order the ABIs. This should ensure the most valid replacement > > order. > > Great, that's better than what I had thought about > > > Additionally, I have added an assertion to ensure that DEFAULT_ABI > > comes last in MULTILIB_ABIS list. > > I'm not sure it is a good idea: it is certainly safe, but this removes > the flexibility not to build for the DEFAULT_ABI. Not sure if it's > sane to do so or if there is any usecase either, but since get_all_abis > ensures us DEFAULT_ABI is last I don't see a need to double check it > here. Well, you are probably right. No point in being more strict than multilib.eclass. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
