-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/02/13 01:14 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > 2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu>: >> On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> >>> Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask? >> >> I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if >> the newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one. >> > That should be probably the best approach, to actually kill of the > lone ones and keep the linux-firmware only. > > Tom >
There aren't cases where a user with older hardware would want to have access to the older (lone) firmwares, is there? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlEVQMkACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAqVwD/S9mjN2lGoQbffIRZqraAg5SI NxsksQcjwS0EgtTQ2MYBAKeCzrLhtXRpQSn6i2fXlDLFk3W1Qa/RhiPQmWfU3iCw =SPkG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
