On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb <purs...@ca.inter.net> wrote: >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb <purs...@ca.inter.net> wrote: >>>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. >>>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. >>> So you broke the threading on the original email, >>> you deleted all the previous content, >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail >>> and then you claim you solved a problem >>> without mentioning what the problem was. >> >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation >> & help other users who may face the same problem, >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. >> >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : >> > > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to > gentoo-dev just to > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even > mentioning the title. > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok
Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And has been for almost a year?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
