On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jeroen Roovers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC) > Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted: >> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs >> > commit twice with cvs. >> >> But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already >> pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything >> but. > > Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with > the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
I didn't interpret it that way. cvs commits are just kind of expensive, even without repoman doing checks.
