On 05/04/2013 03:12 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > I just forgot the tricky part. > If future lvm versions are going to use udev more extensively (for eg: > storing more critical metadata in it), the net result will be that > mdev won't work anymore. This is why I wrote that lvm is working "by > miracle for now". > mdev is not future proof wrt lvm support.
Sounds dangerously bad, I guess the response by the interested parties (e.g. nas builders) will be moving lvm in bb or switch to dragonfly or freebsd. lu
