Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are patently not suited for developing a stable distribution without asking devrel? Because last time we got into the same judge, jury, and executioner argument, which I guess was just sent for the gallows (pun intended).
Mind, it's not like I disagree with at least one of the actions that you took recently, but given your surge approach I would like to point out that is not your task judging code quality, and yes that does make me uncomfortable, that you want to pick up the full power at once, and not collaborate with whom should have been involved in the process. Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling > across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that > such behaviour is not acceptable and they should try to behave > properly. However, people have ignored such warnings for a very long > time. This ends today. > > The DevRel policy states that: > "If the issue is deemed critical, the developer in question may have > his or her access suspended while a vote takes place. In such > situations, the Developer Relations lead may act without a vote of the > remaining Developer Relations team; this power is granted by Council. > Except in critical situations where immediate action is required, such > disciplinary action is determined by members of the Developer Relations > project."[1] > > For me, this problem is critical. Devrel is working on formalizing a new > policy, and we will announce news on this soon. In the meantime, to > prevent further escalations, I will use my lead powers to request > immediate bans whenever I see one of you violate the CoC[2] and ignore > the previous warnings. > > My fellow developers, it's time you finally realize that > you are part of a community and you must learn to behave > and respect each other even if you have different technical views. > We are all people sharing a common interest: Gentoo. > > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/policy.xml#doc_chap2 > [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/coc.xml > > - -- > Regards, > Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer > http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) > > iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRwev1XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzNTVDNDczOUYzRjJEMTRGNDRGMzU2RkMw > OUJGNEY1NEMyQkE3RjNDAAoJEAm/T1TCun88CgkQAMPF0Uf8r92+ne4D1CghUQKC > ujo2B9UDBx6jOs//XZ6A+az2bWQdBUm+ca6v755VasVMnDmcfHM+0+ibqtPcVMaK > XHUMZhkgok9KlWptKqJOdSLlInY2KhHmA0jjktUyByIILgMKcqlL5pVd/jUN6bXU > y54nDCgne4zx0fiK0QGV6hzRqCn9RFtxTsW4qIoxRIaM7oME0Zm6LmdFJrFLhpPC > 9N9JDuxKdKgmN4njT3sNDa2dQD/InZm+k2ZejLFWZqmlvbo54xQTA2YvjrRa+jTr > yJjLTiKvt7pZLZrF7QlzvQULR2966Jlh3wdXhDJRrvvIFgWCZCW7x1VatnLde+z0 > fM5cAuBWCVHyKFJUJXlgvzPJVTmBD4mjJUzhI9Co6eJbkauZ1VKzlHzDZPsdDgrw > DmuXUfSsll+1tIg8Mjq0CAO8jqvTMQKbdcrthMAvcpWw8FKa+HIddFa60H0sKeXH > TmXUPLP+7RwgLIoMtTelrpb5yoJsNeFG9Hlhwhn6Sh68ItYKkeg7Qopi8IhpdmKR > x3mrWXXY1k4SdChhQ4vgiQLOGA7KJquZQJ43i1phe7RGvsXHBU9M65/IHNkWxODE > ZdwS20di9WoIulvep9P3b0wHsY/zL4HLmQEjPsqriGScZdJM/bcIpu1Dn34ZgXhy > 6NvYvqpCfyoXN757mwOs > =2cCK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
