On 08/14/2013 10:07 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:59:37 +0200 > hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> You're fundamentally misunderstanding how PMS and Gentoo development >>> works. >> >> I think you are fundamentally misunderstanding. I think gentoo should >> stop supporting downstreams IF supporting them means blocking >> progress. > > What's this got to do with anything we're discussing? PMS isn't a > "downstream". It's what the Council decided is allowed in the tree. Or > are you suggesting the Council is somehow a downstream that is blocking > progress? I don't follow what you're implying here.
I can't help you with that. I'm just saying what my opinion as a developer is and that I will vote/push into that direction. > >>>> And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general >>>> progress in gentoo. >>> >>> >>> Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works >> >> You certainly are not an authority when it comes to that question... > > Well no exactly