El mar, 24-09-2013 a las 22:38 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: > Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 21:07:26 schrieb Markos Chandras: > > On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > > On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: > > >> (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits > > >> which is a worrying argument on its own) > > > > > > 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: <+bonsaikitten> ago: do me a favour and > > > de-keyword all affected packages for s390 > > > > > > Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't > > > understand what you mean. > > > > I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. > > > > All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable > > keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. > > Yeah, but while this process is ongoing, repoman will barf on the "remaining > stable set"... so better remove it in one go. > > -- > Andreas K. Huettel > Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) > dilfri...@gentoo.org > http://www.akhuettel.de/ > >
Maybe repoman could be fixed: if ~sh and sh keywords will be enabled for sh users, why repoman doesn't follow it? (and, then, let both keywords to supply the needed deps)
