24.09.2013 23:07, Markos Chandras пишет: > On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: >> On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: >>> (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits >>> which is a worrying argument on its own) > >> 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: <+bonsaikitten> ago: do me a favour and >> de-keyword all affected packages for s390 > >> Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't >> understand what you mean. > > I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. > > All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable > keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. > >
I think optimal solution here is to СС unstable arches on stable requests for new versions of packages to let them drop stable keywords. And if they are silent - dropping keywords with all revdeps by maintainer itself when other arches are done with stabilization. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
