-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 25/09/13 10:51 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> William, I think what Tom was mentioning here is that he thinks >> a one-sentence answering the "Why" would be a good idea to have >> in the news item, so users that don't have a clue on all of these >> sep-/usr issues will get an idea of why the change is being >> made. > > How about something like: Due to many upstream changes properly > supporting a separate /usr without an initramfs has become > increasingly difficult - despite all our efforts it already breaks > in some exotic configurations, and this is a trend likely to grow > worse. > > Rich >
How about changing "[properly] supporting a separate /usr without an initramfs" to "supporting a system with /usr missing at boot time" ? More generic, indicates the actual problem better. Otherwise sounds great to me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlJC+7QACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAXxgEAhbkqYQjs5G1kdklcVSYVoCCd ZXYCAhBVryEqFycMPfABAMCKsbLx0uD0ZGxWbX/PXfpdVSogvd54fOemDWVV6leq =XOnB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
