>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote: >> For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project. >> (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of >> another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.)
> It should be a subproject of QA. Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were suggested. The past QA disliked having Licenses as their subproject, though. It depends on how the role of QA is defined: If it is seen as primarily technical, then Licenses (which is largely non-technical) doesn't fit so well. Ulrich
pgp5Du_iFHJI0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
