-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/21/2013 04:21 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote: > >>> For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project. >>> (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of >>> another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.) > >> It should be a subproject of QA. > > Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were suggested. The past > QA disliked having Licenses as their subproject, though. It depends > on how the role of QA is defined: If it is seen as primarily > technical, then Licenses (which is largely non-technical) doesn't > fit so well. > > Ulrich >
ACCEPT_LICENSE is a user-controlled variable that has global effect on a gentoo installation. If our tree is not consistent in terms of thoroughness of license information, then that decreases user experience and we'll likely lose people who take "free software" seriously. So to me this is definitely a QA issue. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSjzpSAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzu7gIAJMs7//HK9fMNqHnSZMit/3Y hph+pKU/fgwK8qqc1qhkW2jHuxKL7Dq0ElNHNJ0+Vap242gsVDDcMAgtQHYViRTi k0jSVDWEYxGbXzquIkcAFvQyKQDXVdNFoca9Sn2OCDJ91sSokzibQbNoSiIDvKKd PSI0Rza0VupW/Lb6fqE998VAuL3rA4rqss8u59MZPgV9NztZIcKvAseSuSIxyu3z XBfkauktBrFAM7qOO1Hxkgrxl2709ty/deX+24sIuyip1k9ORjeNcR169c++3VrA yHp18KShlAJCTaf1CLBVeUz7DV+k5CzDw+loXcrbyoTGML8T8zIjZRzXisJHUng= =08Gq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
