On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:11:24 -0500 Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 08:08 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > > This is under the assumption that the user knows of the state of the > > stabilization worsening; if the user is unaware of that change, the > > "could have done anyway" might be less common and first something > > bad would need to happen before they realize the worsened > > stabilization. > > > > If I don't realize it, it ain't broke. So, you're going to wait for corruption, a security breach or something along those lines to happen first? Corruption is what stabilization of consistent dependencies can prevent, rather than relying on a >=... dependency too much. Security is what prevents security bugs from remaining present. And so on... If you don't realize it, it ain't fixed. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
