On 28/02/14 16:41, Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an
>> ebuild, if user hasn't
>> set otherwise.
>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is
>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d"
>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}"
>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting themself
>> in the foot
>>
>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills to
>> make that happen w/
>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open a
>> feature request bug?
>>
> No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths.
>
> Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks.
>You should stop attacking people. Period.
