On 28/02/14 19:01, Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:41:23 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>> On 28/02/14 16:41, Lars Wendler wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an
>>>> ebuild, if user hasn't
>>>> set otherwise.
>>>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is
>>>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d"
>>>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}"
>>>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting
>>>> themself in the foot
>>>>
>>>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills
>>>> to make that happen w/
>>>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open
>>>> a feature request bug?
>>>>
>>> No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths.
>>>
>>> Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks.
>>>
>> You should stop attacking people. Period.
> Once you stop trying to make things worse in Gentoo I will consider
> stopping my attacks... so it's up to you.
>Is there anything you'd like to add before I open the comrel bug about baseless accusation of making things intentionally worse? - Samuli
