On 02/04/14 11:28, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:00:19 +0300 > Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 02/04/14 05:02, Matt Turner wrote: >>> You don't seem to understand what Samuli is saying. QA is being used >>> as an offensive weapon. It's a stick to bludgeon others with. >> Exactly. Anyone remembers what happened the last time this was tried? >> >> [...] > What does the previous QA team's actions have to do with this topic?
It's the previous QA team's actions and mistakes we can learn from. You know, to avoid repeating them. > >> Force is not hardly ever the correct answer. It might work in a >> workplace, but not when people are contributing for free. > In the workplace; people say "no", stand up and leave the room. That's reality only for small percentage of working people. The majority will do as they are told, and don't even consider saying "no" as that would risk their job, and thus, salary, and the way you pay your mortgage, your house, and feed your family. - Samuli
