On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:59 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Dirkjan Ochtman: >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:37 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> So libressl is meant as a drop-in replacement for openssl. >> >> Some caveats have already been discovered: >>
So, libressl is really nowhere near ready for prime time or even late night TV (perhaps the day time talk shows, but that is a stretch given the PRNG situation). I think preparing a virtual and updating dependent ebuilds for the explosion of replacements is grand, however we should make it _very_ clear to everyone that issues exist that make libressl unsafe for anything other than play time. Thanks, Matthew Summers Gentoo Foundation Inc. GPG: 111B C438 35FA EDB5 B5D3 736F 45EE 5DC0 0878 9D46
