Rich Freeman wrote: > If you just want to do 15 standalone commits before you push you can > do those sequentially easily enough. A branch would be more > appropriate for some kind of mini-project. .. > That is the beauty of git - branches are really cheap. > So are repositories
And commits. Not only are branches cheap, they are also very easy to create, and maybe most importantly they can be created at any time, even after the commits. It's quick and painless to create a bunch of commits which aren't really closely related in sequence, and only later clean the whole series of commits up while creating different branches for commits which should actually be grouped rather than mixed all together. //Peter
