Thanks for looking it up Matthias. Sounds like me or someone else will get to it asap (not on my laptop right now to commit). On Oct 5, 2014 4:45 PM, "Matthias Maier" <tamiko+gen...@kyomu.43-1.org> wrote:
> > Am 05. Oct 2014, 15:20 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu > >: > > > Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if > it > > breaks. > > Upstream bug is at [1]. According to comment 1 also upstream does not > seem to test non-pam use cases all that often. > > I have the impression that all this fuzz around bug 524074 could have > been handled in a much more civilized manner... > > "Are users forced to use PAM?" - we might want to inform upstream > (politely) that we still support non-pam use cases. Otherwise the > dependency might become mandatory. > > Best, > Matthias > > [1] http://www.sudo.ws/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=667 > >
