On 11/07/2014 08:08 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 07:54 PM, Matthias Maier wrote:
>>> Well, you're not comparing like with like. Paludis with "everything
>>> turned off" does more than Portage with "everything turned on". If all
>>> you're looking for is the wrong answer as fast as possible, there are
>>> easier ways of getting it...
>>
>> The last time I compared the resolver speed of portage and paludis both
>> needed almost the same time.
>>
>> Do you have a speed comparison with a similar feature set of both? (Or,
>> alternatively, the speedup one gains by tuning paludis to be as fast as
>> possible).
>>
> 
> I think you didn't get the idea: it doesn't make much sense to compare
> the speed if the correctness differs.
> 
> Also, I don't understand these discussions. The time dependency
> resolving takes is marginal compared to the whole update process, no
> matter what PM you use.
> 

When it compiles in background after all dependencies was solved, it
needs no user intervention. But when I need to solve some blocks or do
some tests during maintaining work, the dependency solving time is what
I care about, as I need to wait for it and then investigate the results.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to