On 02/21/2015 10:16 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015, 20:16:31 schrieb hasufell:
> 
>> What did the council say again about the functionality of the team?
>> What's the argumentation to not do anything, except deciding policies
>> over it's head?
> 
> functionality != willingness to interact with others
> 

So if a project ignores the community, the council, the QA team AND
violates GLEP39, we allow that, because they still do commits?

That isn't very logical.

Reply via email to