On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:04:55 +0800
Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 15 March 2015 at 06:34, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfri...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > imho,
> >
> >> Questions:
> >> 0. What names for the tree/repository.
> >
> > "gentoo"
> > (it's also the repo_name)
>
> Our repo is already named "gentoo", so this makes the most sense.
>
> But I wouldn't mind "gentoo-main" either. But then we should also
> change the repo_name.
>
> While we are at it, can we change the default location from
> /usr/portage to something like /var/repos/${repo_name} then?
>
The hold up for that was catalyst which had /usr/portage hardcoded all
over the place. Not only that, but the hard-coded path was also used
as both a variable name and path at the same time. :(
I have nearly all the 3.0 rewrite branch merged into master finally.
I'll begin some testing again soon to make sure it works properly with
the "gentoo" repo relocated. It shouldn't be long to have a new
release based on the 3.0 re-write making stages for release.
--
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>
