On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:49:44 -0400 Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2015-03-23 13:48, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
> > You want to have a herd for that or something in metadata.xml that would 
> > raise a
> > flag that the package can be freely touched/maintained by anyone?
> 
> I'd rather have a herd so people can easily scan via euscan or similar to see
> the entire array of pkgs falling into the space. Abusing another metadata 
> field
> doesn't give the same visibility or would require changes from tools.
> 
> For example, bugs assigned to the herd or with it in CC could be fixed by
> anyone without having to ask for permission. How would that be handled easily
> when using an extra metadata field?

Assume that half of the tree joined this idea. Mail traffic on this
herd will be insane.

I'm in favour of a special tag idea, equery tool may be updated to
show it on `equery meta $pkgname` calls.

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko

Attachment: pgpr_65K89ad7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to