On 2015-03-23 18:54, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Personally I think a tag in metadata to show that a package can be > touched by others freely would be much more useful than having a big > herd with a mix of packages that are not even related.
Sure, I'd just like to expose this status in a better manner for the set of official and unofficial tools out there than having to grep the tree or similar. I'm fine with a metadata flag if people can agree on what that is as I'm unsure if the previous discussion on that topic went anywhere. > If people usually don't have time to fix the tons of packages that > lacks a maintainer (and, then, they could also fix them without asking > for permission), I doubt that new herd would get much real help :( This isn't about unmaintained pkgs or asking for help. It's more an experiment in non-territorial package maintenance. Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
