-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/15 01:52 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:39:21 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius > <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> ...OR we could just adjust PMS to assume flag order determines >> precedence and still not bother with a new operator: For "^^ ( >> a b c )" if a then b,c forced-off; elif b then c forced-off; >> elif !c then a forced-on; fi > > that's another possible option indeed >
Is this something that we would need to change PMS for? Syntax stays the same, just the way portage (in particular here) acts on it would be different... For testing, is what I'm thinking, say tied to a "resolve-required-use" feature? If we don't -need- to change PMS we could just -do- this and see if it works. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlXLkhwACgkQAJxUfCtlWe2icgD/fvbn2O70mE2QJs5+mOfxwZEx Y6huevd2KkJnaEHmlPEBAOvLe3gLDR/KUgvQVytBAXxgu+XsDcN/SDZEt94K0ptE =ySbZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
