Hi, On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> I think cargo should probably go in dev-util with other rust >> libraries and programs going into dev-rust as needed, but that's >> just me :D > > Agreed. dev-util until it grows in size (isn't the recommendation > 5-10+ pkgs?), then dev-rust. Despite the package moves being somewhat > cumbersome, it makes more sense to do it once it's clear Rust has an > ecosystem going rather than catch stragglers in its infancy. > Ok, looks quite logical for me. So the next question. I remember portage had some problems with moving packages. Would it work if I'll move dev-rust/cargo to dev-util/cargo in our overlay now. And later when rust infrastructure grows move it in the main tree back to dev-rust? Or will it break something? -- Jauhien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature