-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 16/11/15 10:14, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Probably those that want to ban it should fix the(ir) tree so that 
> developers have no pain in bumping to eapi6?

Versioned APIs are made to have incompatible changes. What do you like
to see? Someone dropping all usages of that eclass from all ebuilds
which are using it so that the maintainer can bump without thinking? I
agree with you later statement that the eclasses have been announced
to be a great solution when using autotools based packages, and
dropping it now means going back to the old. But the changes needed
are just straight forward, drop the eclass and use the default
functions of EAPI=6. Plus the autotools.eclass when you need to run
autoreconf and friends.

> While I agree we should move away from those eclasses, the "I
> decided to throw the crap at other developers with eapi6 without
> deprecation period" is a bit hard to grasp. Esp. when these
> eclasses were advertised as the way to go not so long ago...
> 

I don't really understand what deprecation you like to see? We cannot
use EAPI=6 right now and when it starts to exist, nothing will be
broken. So you have some to time to adopt your thinking until you
write your first ebuild in EAPI=6.

At which particular point do you seen problems coming up? What do you
think will make maintainers struggle with that change?

Justin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0
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=zJp2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to