On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools : >> >> Better suited for base-system, maybe? >> >> > sys-fs/jfsutils : >> >> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them. > > sounds fine for both. generally fs tools probably should live under > base-system for consistency.
Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed under the base-system project because the base-system project members intend to maintain it. I don't want to see packages placed into projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those projects if it means they'll just be neglected. I have no idea which is the case here. If the base-system maintainers want to maintain these two packages, have at it! If not, leave it as maintainer-needed. -- Rich
