On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: > >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: > >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools : > >> > >> Better suited for base-system, maybe? > >> > >> > sys-fs/jfsutils : > >> > >> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them. > > > > sounds fine for both. generally fs tools probably should live under > > base-system for consistency. > > Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed > under the base-system project because the base-system project members > intend to maintain it. I don't want to see packages placed into > projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those > projects if it means they'll just be neglected. > > I have no idea which is the case here. If the base-system maintainers > want to maintain these two packages, have at it! If not, leave it as > maintainer-needed.
if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
