On 01/27/16 14:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> -# @FUNCTION: latex-package_has_tetex3 -# @RETURN: true if at
> least one of (>=tetex-3 or >=ptex-3.1.8 or >=texlive-core-2007) is
> installed, else false -# @DESCRIPTION: -# It is often used to know
> if the current TeX installation supports gentoo's -# texmf-update
> or if the package has to do it the old way
> -latex-package_has_tetex_3() { - if has_version
> '>=app-text/tetex-3' || has_version '>=app-text/ptex-3.1.8' ||
> has_version '>=app-text/texlive-core-2007' ; then - true - else -
> false - fi -} +case ${EAPI:-0} in + 0|1|2|3|4|5) + # Kept
> for
> backwards compatibility + latex-package_has_tetex_3() { true; } +
> ;; +esac
>
Why remove the preexisting comment marked up for documentation
generation which indicated what it did and why, and stub it out with a
generically uninformative comment instead of just adding a deprecation
notice and literally one line of text to indicate why it was
deprecated and stubbed out? I am not taking issue with the change to
the code itself, just the removal of documentation in it.
