>>>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: > Well, if we're going to force it to be in the stage3, I guess this > boils down to whether eudev or udev is the better nano.
"Nicht alles was hinkt ist ein Vergleich", as we say in German. Emacs has a flexible extension language, whereas nano uses a configuration file. Not sure in which direction this would map to OpenRC and systemd. > I think it makes far more sense to just remove some of the controversy > by taking it out of the system set first. Then I doubt anybody would > notice the switch. Take what out of the system set? virtual/udev isn't there, in the first place, and virtual/dev-manager is needed for a working system. Ulrich
pgpMnNS5rVUM_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
