On 11/02/16 14:46, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 12 February 2016 at 03:43, M. J. Everitt <m.j.ever...@iee.org> wrote: >> auto-unmask has a very inconsistent, unstable way of >> working with a package.use folder not file ... > > auto-unmask consistently adds items to the file with the highest > dictionary sort. > > So if you name all the files with numerical prefixes, 00 .. 99, "99" > is where auto-unmask will write to. > Well, that's obvious ........
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... NP-Hardass
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Kent Fredric
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Daniel Campbell
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Kent Fredric
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Raymond Jennings
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... M. J. Everitt
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Kent Fredric
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... M. J. Everitt
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Kent Fredric
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... M. J. Everitt
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Kent Fredric
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Róbert Čerňanský
- [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy" us... Duncan
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy"... Kent Fredric
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy"... Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy"... Gordon Pettey
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" us... Kent Fredric
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? Gordon Pettey
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? Daniel Campbell
- Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? William Hubbs