On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change > > > the virtual back. One-line change. > > > > Which is precisely the corresponding argument for not switching the > > default to eudev in the first place. > > OH, my, this is looking more like you are being paid by systemd peeps...
honestly ? cut the crap man. > You are just refusing to acknowledge these simple facts. > > systemd.................: irrelevant to this decision > > standalone systemd-udev.: Vehemently unsupported, support for its > capability to exist is planned to be punted > in the future. > > eudev...................: fully functional, actively developed, > and fully supported, mature project, been > around for years. udev: it's the default in every major distro that everyone tests and develops against. eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it. > Oh and here is one final piece that should blow your reason away > > https://github.com/gentoo/eudev <== NOTICE that it's upstream is > within our gentoo domain. irrelevant. any Gentoo dev can create any repo in that namespace even when they shouldn't. the fact that eudev is in there does *not* mean the whole Gentoo project has signed on to it, or that it's some sort of "banner" project. it means at least one Gentoo dev decided to do X and our project system doesn't require project consensus before X can proceed. do not conflate these. -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
