On 05/05/2016 01:12 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:41:39PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: >> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:57:44AM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >>> On 05/04/2016 10:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:00:05AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote: >>>>>>> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the >>>>>>> Portage tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch >>>>>>> any init scripts installed from elsewhere. You should look for the >>>>>>> set of installed files instead. >>>>>> How is that relevant here at all? I'm cleaning up portage installed >>>>>> init scripts, [...] >>>>> You are cleaning up only those init scripts that are installed from >>>>> FILESDIR, but you will miss the ones that are installed from a file >>>>> in SRC_URI. >>>> Perhaps an alternate way to do it would be to have a QA check look at >>>> any files installed to ${D}etc/init.d/ and throw a warning if their >>>> shebang is "#!/sbin/runscript" >>>> >>> A repoman check is a much saner approach, I'm not convinced there is >>> sufficient need for this change to begin with, in particular to start >>> touching a wide range of packages. Breaking backwards compatibility in >>> any way should have a darn good reason, and I haven't seen one yet >> I'm not arguing for or against it in general, just in terms of technical >> implementation. >> >> That being said, a repoman check would only catch those distributed in >> ${FILESDIR} as well. My thinking with the above was to also identify >> those installed from distfiles to be handled accordingly. > Actually, you won't need to worry about any qa checks in portage, > because I am going to put a deprecation warning in OpenRC upstream which > will be displayed when a service script invokes runscript instructing > you to convert to openrc-run. > > OpenRC will keep runscript, with this warning, for a while. > > So again, because I feel like either I'm too stupid to understand this, or too smart to let such an obviously bad idea continue:
What problem is being solved here?