On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 06/17/2016 07:05 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: >> >> Then everyone PLEASE stop referring to the Gentoo ebuild tree as >> portage. Reserve portage for the upstream PACKAGE MANAGER. > > indeed >
Agree, though this wasn't the sense I meant it in (in case there was any confusion). 1. There is the Gentoo Repo (which I always try to describe using those words). 2. Then there is the sys-apps/portage package in the Gentoo repo. 3. And then there is the portage upstream that occasionally makes releases that end up as #2. It is between 2-3 that we need to distinguish here. I agree with the suggestion that context is sufficient already. -- Rich
