On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:27:18 -0700 Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 06:02 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for > >> decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say about systems that > >> want games on other media (such as an SSD or separate HDD), or wish to > >> restrict the use of games on their system to certain accounts? > > > > Has anyone complained about either of these features going away? If > > they're purely theoretical concerns... > > > > The games.eclass saga has gone on plenty long enough. I would much > > prefer that we not relitigate it. I understand that you may not have > > been around when most of it happened initially, but please understand > > that it's not feasible to reconsider every decision when new > > developers join the project. > > > I understand where you're coming from, but a lack of yelling or > complaining isn't logically equivalent to consensus. It's a fair point > to make, though. We don't know until we ask, so I'll post something on > gentoo-user about it. Did you know that Gentoo users are more likely to want something once you tell them they can want it? Even if it doesn't really make any sense, and they never felt like needing it in the past. So you're likely to make more noise than it's worth, and turn a minor loss into a major one. 'Hey, I'm telling you you can do X since we're removing it, enjoy it for a few days!' -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpPo632sYvR4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
