El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 17:09 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 +0000 Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but.. > > > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > > Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:22:22 +0200 > > > > ..do you think you can arrange to post everything in one mail, > > instead of 14 different ones in a single day? > > I suppose these posts are automated (at least partially), since each > of them is linked to a different retirement bug. So you shouldn't > blame Pacho for his work. > > Best regards, > Andrew Savchenko
No, sadly all the work is manual... and that is the reason I do every step per person, because as it takes lots of time, I want to finish one person completely before either jumping to the next or going to do other things. The reason is that I cannot predict if I will be able to handle all the remaining cases or, maybe, I will need to do 3 today, 5 tomorrow... maybe 10 in two months when I have time again. This way at least I let people to start getting the packages as soon as I finish a person and other can start to work as soon as possible on the bug reports without needing to wait for me finishing all. Then, it's a bit a consequence of the workflow (paradoxically, I have a different workflow when treecleaning that ends up usually with me sending a big mail with the packages I am able to hardmask on a day... and some people complained because they wanted one mail per package ^_^)
