On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:55:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I've started writing a GLEP to formalize and confirm the current > > practices for committing third-party contributions into Gentoo. It's > > meant mostly to clear the rules for pull requests. However, the rules > > are generic enough to cover other contribution media -- patches > > attached to bugs, etc. > > > Please review the following draft: > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:TPC > > I am strictly opposed to making github or pull requests part of our > official workflow or policy. > > So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but > not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned > neither in the Specification or the Rationale. Why not in the rationale? It is the most straightforward way of explaining why it's made optional like this. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpBPAllo2cji.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
