On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > [snip] > > To be honest, after writing it all down, I started to get the feeling > it isn't necessary after all. The initial idea (and what motivation was > supposed to mean) was that all previous attempts failed because they > either tried to be too specific, force too many style rules or just > never got necessary 'global' to reach all affected parties. > > I'd dare say this GLEP ended up confirming 'third party contributions' > are not that special, we don't need special teams to handle them or > special rules to cover them. > > So yes, it would probably be enough to put such a simple statement > somewhere. The problem is: where? ;-) GLEP seemed like a > straightforward solution to make it global. >
Could it be relevant on the git workflow page? I consult that on a regular basis (it's even in my watch list), and accepting/pushing contributions seems like it's right in line with our expected git workflow. Just a thought. I like where you're going with the idea. -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
