>>>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we >> are trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't >> define the term [2].
> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be > stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both > components. PMS uses "package dependency specification", but that may be too long for the name of the field. How about "ebuilds to stabilise"? Ulrich
pgpmnuTmlJynS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
