Ühel kenal päeval, T, 03.01.2017 kell 09:34, kirjutas Damien LEVAC: > > On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > > > On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > > > gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: > > > > > > > > > > IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead > > > > > and it > > > > > heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. > > > > I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point > > > > of view) the > > > > most convenient tool to control ethernet and wifi connections > > > > on a > > > > notebook. Why lastrite it when it works? > > > This is the Gentoo Way™. Having a working software is not a goal. > > > Gentoo focuses on the best bleeding edge experience and therefore > > > highly relies on software packages that are under active > > > development > > > and require active maintenance. The packages in early stages of > > > development are especially interesting since they can supply > > > users > > > and developers with variety of interesting bugs and unpredictable > > > issues. > > > > > From your response I infer the following, please discuss: > > 1) "working software is not a goal" .. so we can have a tree full > > of > > broken and/or unstable packages. What is the point of any QA/CI > > system > > if this is applicable? > > 2) "require active maintainance" .. by whom exactly? Where are the > > flood > > of keen developers bringing their bleeding edge code (with their > > ludicrous packaging requirements and language demands) to Gentoo? > > 3) "interesting bugs and unpredictable isssue" .. WTF? > > > > Michal .. are you (once again...) High .. or is your email (once > > again) > > so soaked in sarcasm we can't tell any useful content from the > > complete > > drivel ... > > > It was obviously sarcasm... The "Gentoo Way™" was the hint... It is > a > cynical criticism of younger generation of developers mixing > intellectual curiosity with what should be an ultra-stable platform. > (Or > this is how I interpreted it...)
I believe with this mgorny has given ample proof that he is just a ciaranm sock puppet account. Now where did I leave my pitchfork at...
